November, 2009

...now browsing by month

 

Reading: a bunch of links from the past week

Sunday, November 8th, 2009

Here is a batch of links from the past week or so, for your reading pleasure. Sorry to get to it so late. The biggest story was probably the HSUS veal slaughterhouse investigation, but I’ve only included one link to a story about it below. I’ll try to do a recap post about that story sometime this week.

NPR: For Foer, Meat is Murder …And Worse

New Yorker review of Eating Animals

Wolves, moose and biodiversity: An unexpected connection

Hearts on Noses pig sanctuary fundraiser at Karmavore

HSUS veal slaughterhouse investigation

Poultry giant Tyson sued by the state of Oklahoma

Meat loving cowboy is still vegan

Supervegan: Does it matter that Jonathan Safran Foer isn’t vegan?

Digging through the dirt: ‘Bones’ Features Factory Farm, Slaughterhouse Footage

VegNews interview with Jonathan Safran Foer

Change.org Animal Rights blog: There Is No Such Animal as “Seafood”

Animal Place: Divine Turkey Talk

The Vegan Dietician: No Need for Vegans to Give Up Fat, Gluten, Soy or Cooked Foods

Filthy Feed & downer cattle

Wednesday, November 4th, 2009

I read yesterday on Vegan.com about a new site called “Filthy Feed” that “exposes and seeks to end the practice of feeding broiler litter (read: chicken shit) to cattle.”

This is pretty gross, and I can’t believe that this practice still goes on. I wonder how much of that meat makes it up here to Canada?

Canada has had a ban against the feeding of poultry and litter to ruminants for many years now (our ban went into effect around 1997). Our little bout with mad cow disease was the real reason for this. It seems that we were feeding out cattle remains to chickens and turkeys, and there’s too much risk that the poultry litter (the hay or straw and shit on the floor of the barn, plus feathers and the carcasses of the chickens who didn’t make it the full 6 weeks) might contain some undigested remains of a cow.

I understand that farms face the prospect of losing money pretty much all the time (and likely wouldn’t survive if they weren’t massively subsidized through cheap feed, etc), but who really first came up with the idea of scraping up all this shit and waste and grinding it up to add to food for other animals?

Strangely, for all our concern with mad cow disease, Canada has not banned the slaughter of downer animals. The regulations only state that animals may not be transported if they are too sick to walk, but nothing is said about slaughtering them if they can be induced to enter the truck under their own power. (source)

So, we can’t feed chicken waste to cattle, but we can slaughter cows who are too sick to walk into the slaughterhouse (who are more likely to have mad cow as well). Are we really working to prevent mad cow and protect human health or just choosing easy actions that don’t really have any effect on the practices ofthe meat industry that put us all at risk?

Wool

Monday, November 2nd, 2009

Sheep evolved to live in places that are mountainous and very often cold, hence their coat of wool. They were domesticated thousands of years ago, and now domestic sheep are quite distinct from their wild cousins.

Domestic sheep are bred to produce much more wool than they would produce in their natural habitat, often in areas that are warmer and more humid than they would naturally live.

On industrial sheep farms there are many cases of abusive practices, practices which are very much the standard.

Lambs have their tails removed because it is difficult to keep that area clean with so much wool, and there is a danger of fly strike. “Docking” the tail also makes shearing easier.

Male lambs are usually castrated – and castration with sheep happens like most other farm animals: without anesthesia.

In nature, sheep do not need to have their tails docked or their testicles removed.

In nature as well sheep do not need to be shorn. They shed their wool like other animals shed their hair. Sheep are bred to produce more wool than is healthy, which causes problems like fly strike since it is difficult for the sheep to keep themselves clean. Some sheep are bred to have wrinkly skin so that there will be more skin surface, which means they grow more wool.

One of the most extreme forms of mutilation is “mulesing,” which is a process where the skin from around the sheep’s rear end is removed in strips, leaving only scar tissue, almost always without any painkillers. This is common practice in Australia and New Zealand, although there are efforts underway there to phase out the practice. This “procedure” is done to prevent flystrike. Flystrike, for those of you who don’t know, is when flies lay eggs in an animal’s skin in an area that they can’t clean. The breeding of sheep to produce so much wool and keeping them in areas that are warm and humid creates an environment that sheep have not evolved to deal with. Instead of stopping the continued breeding of these animals and perpetuating the problem, farmers tear strips of skin out of their backs.

Veterinarians are so often on the side of the exploiters of these animals that they rationalize and justify the continuation of these practices, instead of stepping in and stopping the breeding of the animals in the first place, which would stop so much more of the pain and suffering involved.

In the end, humans don’t need wool. It is easy to avoid wearing wool. Buying wool perpetuates a system of exploitation that we don’t need to support.

For more information about mulesing visit:

http://www.animalsaustralia.org/issues/mulesing.php

The Wikipedia pages on domestic sheep and wild sheep are also quite interesting.

I found some interesting details about tail docking and castration here:

http://www.sheep101.info/201/dockcastrate.html