vegetarian

...now browsing by tag

 
 

Take 5 minutes, save 5 animals

Saturday, January 14th, 2012

 

The Humane League has discovered yet another way to engage in onlineadvocacy.  The process is simple: You go to Take5Save5.com, which chooses a random Craigslist page for you, and post an ad stating that you have a free vegetarian starter kit to send it out to anybody who responds with their mailing address.  Any addresses you receive are plugged into the form at Vegstarterpack.com.  They do the rest.

Ads with cute pictures get more results!

Posting an ad on Craigslist is free and relatively painless–you have to register, but just once.  In fact, 5 minutes is a bit of an exaggeration: with the exception of the registration process, it takes about half a minute to post an ad.   Attach a cute farm animal photo (ads with pictures tend to get more attention than those that don’t) and hit “submit”.  The whole process is remarkably easy, and survey results indicate that it works.

Okay, so you may be curious as to what my experience with Take5save5 has been like.  I’ve already told you that it’s exactly as easy as they claim, but is it actually successful?  Over the past couple of weeks or so, I’ve posted a total of 10 ads.  I did them one at time–anything else and you run the risk of spamming Craigslist, which will result in your ads being flagged and removed.   Even if you haven’t done anything wrong, however, you might get flagged: I found that it happened pretty frequently, despite the fact that Take5Save5 says it won’t.  It’s a minor irritation, though, considering the fact that it only takes thirty seconds to post a new ad anyway.

Anyway, I posted 10 ads and got 21 responses.   While some of those ads ended up being flagged, it usually didn’t happen until at least a couple of people had already contacted me!  For maybe a minute of work a few times a week, I’d say that’s more than worth it.  I’m definitely going to keep it up.

Has anybody else used Take5save5?  What was your experience?

More animal-friendly fighters

Sunday, July 3rd, 2011

Check out Matt Wiman's butt! Um, I mean, what's written there.

This is just a quick note on some animal-friendliness at Saturday night’s UFC event. First, Matt Wiman, who lost a close & controversial decision to Dennis Siver, had the Meet Your Meat and Food Inc websites on his shorts. Second, I learned from the broadcast that middleweight Aaron Simpson has now gone vegan. (He went vegetarian several fights ago, after reading Eating Animals.) Simpson won every round of his fight with Brad Tavares on Saturday.

It’s not news that there are vegans and vegetarians at the top levels of mixed martial arts & other sports–and I don’t know much about Wiman’s diet–but this stands out to me as clashing with even more false stereotypes than usual. Aside from the stereotype of vegans and vegetarians as anemic, limp-wristed weaklings (which should be quite thoroughly shattered by now), it’s interesting to see Wiman and Simpson taking an ethical stand on animal agriculture. It’s one thing to fight the misconception that you need to eat meat to be strong, but it’s even better to fight the misconception that it’s somehow unmanly to care about how animals are treated, or that only the overly sentimental are concerned with cruelty.

Here we have two people who make a career out of punching other people in the face, yet who find our treatment of farmed animals unconscionable. And they’re not alone, either. Mac Danzig is probably the fighter most famous for being vegan, and he’s another ethical vegan–it was his experience on a sanctuary that persuaded him to go vegan.

(From another angle, this also contrasts with the stereotype of professional fighters as boneheaded thugs. In fact, as professional athletes go, fighters tend to be highly educated & often quite thoughtful people.)

Way to go, Wipeout!

Wednesday, June 23rd, 2010

Okay, so last night I was feeling particularly weighed down by responsibility and I ended up watching Wipeout.  If you don’t know what it is…

Wipeout is an American game show series in which contestants compete in what is billed as the “world’s largest obstacle course”.

Thanks, Wikipedia!  Anyway, Wipeout is always an entertaining waste of time, but it doesn’t usually tackle anything more serious than…er…big balls.

Big Rubber Balls

Told you so.

So the show does brief, funny interviews with a lot of the contestants, and believe me, if they can find some way to mock one, they will.  On last night’s episode they introduced a woman who was planning to donate her winnings to animal protection causes.  Awesome!  Here’s the interview, which I scribbled down afterwards.  (I think I did a lousy job on the verbatim part, but the basic jist is there.):

Interviewer Jill Wagner: So, you’re a vegetarian?

(Awkward pause.)

Contestant Jonelle Tierney: Well, kinda…I eat fish…and chicken.

Wagner: Oh okay, so you’re against animal cruelty–except for chickens and fish!

Tierney: (laughs nervously) Well, yeah.  We had chickens.  We had chickens on our farm.

Wagner: Your farm?  So you’ve killed chickens?

Tierney: No…turkeys.

Wagner: (laughs) Okay, so you’re against animal cruelty except for chickens and fish and turkeys and…anything else?

Tierney: …cows…

Wagner laughed about how the contestant sounded like she was more in favour of animal cruelty than against it, and later on, the announcers joked about her only being concerned about the cute animals, like puppies and kittens.  And until she was eliminated mid-episode, her nickname was “Killer Animal Lover” or some variety of that!  It was pretty fantastic.  So a big thanks to Wipeout for acknowledging one of the most striking examples of cognitive dissonance in the world today and for managing to be hilarious at the same time.

I wouldn’t worry too much about Jonelle, though–most people (including some of the best animal activists in the world!) started out loving some animals and eating others, so maybe she’ll figure things out eventually.

Some light reading…

Saturday, October 31st, 2009

I’ve decided I’m going to jump in on the tradition of doing a weekly “roundup” of interesting links. I’ll try to do mine on Friday evening (sorry, this time it’s Saturday), to give everyone a bunch of reading material for the weekend. If you’d like it on a different day, let me know.

Vancouver Courier: Groups call for a boycott of Petcetera

Vancouver Courier: Meatless on Monday

Better LCDs Trump an Animal’s Right to Live and Be Left Alone?

Food miles: meaningful enviro-activism or wacky nonsense? Wacky nonsense.

The Vegan Theory of Relativity

Ag Industry Calls for Prosecutions of Undercover Animal Activists

The methane makers

The Tiniest Rescues and the Building of Compassion

HSUS Investigation Uncovers Veal Calf Abuse, Closes Plant

Cooperatives Working Together to Kill Cows

There have been a whole bunch of articles by and about Jonathan Safran Foer, mostly around the publication of his new book, Eating Animals.

Eating animals is making us sick

Jonathan Safran Foer’s Controversial New Book, Eating Animals

Jonathan Safran Foer’s Eating Animals Turned Me Vegan

Eating Animals: Jonathan Safran Foer’s New Book Asks Why Don’t We Eat Pets?

Eating Animals: Why Eating Matters

The Moral Ferocity of Eating Animals

Keep an eye on the Huffington Post. They’re going to be doing a series of responses to JSF’s book. They all seem worth reading so far.

Faulty Arguments Against Veganism, pt. 5

Monday, August 3rd, 2009

Argument: “All this Veganism stuff can only be adhered to by very wealthy people in a society that is very advanced.”

Response: Fortunately, this is nowhere near true.  Unless you are buying a lot of pre-processed fake meats and cheeses–which are pricey, but shouldn’t be a large part of a healthy diet anyway–veganism is actually quite a bit cheaper than the alternative:

Most of the staples of a vegetarian diet are cheap. In fact, most of the world’s people eat a mostly vegetarian diet made up of inexpensive commodities such as beans, rice and corn.If you drop red meat, poultry and fish from your diet, you’ll find plant proteins cheaper than the equivalent amount of animal protein. (Go Vegetarian to Save Money)

Check out the rest of the article from MSN: Go Vegetarian to Save Money, and this one, Recession Flexitarians, which discusses the fact that the current economy is forcing more people to reduce their consumption of meat and dairy.

Faulty Arguments Against Veganism, Part 2

Friday, June 26th, 2009

She sure is enjoying herself

She sure is enjoying herself

This one is kind of a two-fer, since they’re related arguments.  Check out part one here.

Argument: “Animals would be worse off if all people were vegetarians. Think about it. Would a farmer keep Chickens and Cows and Pigs around and pay for them for free. Hell no if they would be free. At which point they would be overpopulated and all over the place.”

Response: The cows, chickens, turkeys, etc, that we eat are not coming into the world naturally; in fact, some of them will never see an animal of the opposite gender in their entire lives. This is basically a simple case of supply-and-demand. If we stop demanding meat, eggs, and dairy, they’ll stop breeding animals to supply us with them. (Learn more about the artificial insemination processes of turkey, chicken, and cows.)

This next person sort of understands some of the facts, and then misses the point completely.

Argument: “These animals are bred only to be killed.It’s harsh,but if we didn’t do that,cows and chickens and rabbits etc would be long extinct.”

Response: Um…rabbits?

Anyway, I’m not sure why the idea of extinction is such a issue when it comes to farm animals.  They do not exist–not as we’ve bred them, anyway–in nature and they do not fit in to any particular ecology; if they died out, the environment would be way better off for it.  Part of the tragedy of extinction when it comes to a wild animal is the effects thereof.   (A good example of this is the black-footed ferret, which has been endangered for years–and briefly “extinct in the wild”–because we keep killing off their primary prey, prairie dogs.)  There isn’t any kind of equivalent situation for farm animals, because there are no species (outside of humans) who rely on their existence.

Species as a whole do not suffer, but individuals do–and individual animals are suffering immensely right now.  I don’t think that anyone who really knows what goes on in the dairy and meat industry actually believing that farm animals are better off existing as they do!

Faulty Arguments Against Veganism, Part 1

Tuesday, June 23rd, 2009

If you are vegan or vegetarian, you’ve probably heard these arguments at least a few times–but more likely, you’ve been beaten over the head with them repeatedly to the point of insanity.  The best part about these oh-so-common arguments against veganism is that they are easily refutable.  Over the next few blog posts, I’ll be giving fun examples I collected from around the web.

Argument: “I don’t think there are enough resources on the earth if everybody decides to go vegetarian/vegan. so I am happy other people eat meat actually.”

Response: It’s more like the opposite:

  • “It takes 2 1/2 pounds of grains to create a pound of chicken,  6 1/2 pounds  to get a pound of pork, and 7 pounds to get a pound of beef. (Ephraim Liebtag, “Corn Prices Near Record High, but What About Food Costs?”, February 2008)
  • Beef uses up 16 times more fossil fuel energy and generates 24 times the Carbon Dioxide than an calorically-equivalent meal of rice and veggies.  (Gidon Eshel, Bard College, Pamela A. Martin, Univ. of Chicago)

And so actually, we’d be using far less resources (and saving the environment) if more people were to go vegan.

vegenvironment

Stay tuned for part 2!

How I became vegan

Saturday, May 2nd, 2009
Run for your life, little chicken!
Run for your life, little chicken!

I didn’t become vegan overnight. In fact, it was a long process, which did not start in animal rights at all.

I grew up on a small homestead in Vermont. We raised some goats for milk, cows and pigs for meat, and grew a lot of our own vegetables. My parents were (and still are) very Christian.

I had heard about vegetarians, but didn’t know any. Didn’t think about the whole idea much at all.

In junior high I learned how to shoot a gun and went hunting. I never shot at any animals, though, but I did go out hunting a few times. I think I was more concerned that hunting wasn’t a very cool thing to do, rather than concerned about animals.

But, there were a couple of vegetarians in my class. So the idea kind of became somewhat familiar to me. Still strange and unrealistic, but now I actually knew people who were living as vegetarians.

I actually became concerned with meat eating because of the pacifist views I developed (partly because of going to church, I think). I really took the whole idea of “thou shalt not kill” to heart, and had a realization that when we slaughter animals to eat, we really are killing them. The violence of taking of their lives began to feel very wrong.

My initial vegetarianism, during my final year of high school, was actually pescetarianism, meaning I still ate fish. This was something of a concession to my parents and to family gatherings.

In my first week at university, I ate the worst tunafish sandwich ever, and that was the end of my fish eating.

I was a regular vegetarian for the next couple of years. But, I still was not really concerned with animals at all, except in an abstract, theoretical way.

My girlfriend at the time (who I eventually married) told me more about the issues of animal welfare and animal rights, as well as the hidden ingredients like rennet and gelatin. I recall giving up leather and cheese before giving up milk.

I didn’t go vegan until my last year at university, which meant I had to really reduce my consumption of pie and pastries, which was difficult. After that, though, I was fully vegan.

Also, living with cats again brought me back in touch with animals, this time from a different perspective than in the past. Now I approached them on their terms, viewing them as individual beings, whereas I had previously viewed animals as things intruding on my life.

The moral of the story is that I became vegan over many years, and it was a complicated process (probably much more complicated in real life than I am presenting it here) involving many factors. It actually didn’t matter what any one person had told me about animal rights or veganism. For me it was a process of trying to cause less harm, and a view to a path towards that goal. One thing I do know now is that there is no end to the process.

So, as we are out trying to raise awareness about the conditions of animals’ lives and an awareness of animal rights, it may be that our message will not convert anyone to our way of thinking. This doesn’t mean that we shouldn’t be out there trying, but we do need to watch that we are not disappointed or angry when people do not change. You never know where they are on their own path. Or where that path is leading them.

What, then, is your story? Please share it in the comments.

Are eggs and dairy worse than meat?

Thursday, February 26th, 2009

Imagine being raised for meat, fattened up, and slaughtered.

Now imagine being raised for your breastmilk, or your eggs.

In the case of milk, you are forcibly raped and impregnated. After a period of months—nine, in the case of both cows and humans—you give birth to a baby. Within hours—or days, if you’re lucky—your baby is taken from you. You won’t see it again. If born male, he usually will become veal. If female, she will be raised to replace other older cows at the dairy.

Machines are attached to your nipples, and, for a few months, the milk meant for your baby is siphoned out.

Then it starts all over.

You’ll give birth to four or five babies, and then it’s off to the cows_dairy1_usdaslaughterhouse. You’ll be turned into cheap meat—of course—because your body is so weak and worn out after four years of producing seven to ten times more milk than you would in nature, and even though you’re perhaps a quarter as old as you could become. Now that you can’t give any more milk, your body is a byproduct.

If you are a chicken, raised for your eggs, you won’t have your babies taken away from you. No matter where you are, though, you will feel an intense drive to prepare for the arrival of chicks. Even in a battery cage, where there is no bedding material, you may attempt to make nests out of the body of a dead cagemate. Your eggs roll down the slanted wire floor of the cage and away from you.

After a year or a year and a half, you will be incredibly weak from your calcium-deficient diet—the creation of an egg requires many nutrients, including calcium—but in order to get a few more hundred eggs from you and the other hens, the farm will induce a period of forced-moulting by starving you. For at least five days, there is no food. Six days pass. Seven. They will be in here for 1-2 years.

The farm may go fourteen days or longer without feeding you, and if you live, you will have lost 30% of your weight. (5 to 10% of the other chickens, of course, will die, and on an average farm that adds up to thousands of birds.) You might be force-moulted one more time, or even twice, in order to get as many eggs from your tired body as possible. And then, when—like the dairy cow—you can’t produce enough of your reproductive secretions (yum), you become cheap meat—dog food, soup, or baby food. You will be less than two years old, about a tenth of your potential lifespan.

It’s odd to think that while people sometimes stop eating meat because of their concern for animals, they continue to consume animal products. Broiler chickens die at around a 45 days old, rather than languishing for a year or a year-and-a-half, and even beef cattle die a couple of years younger than those raised for dairy. Comparatively, the egg and dairy industries cause far more suffering. Think of it this way: egg-laying chickens and dairy cows are still killed for meat—they just suffer longer first.

I can think of few things more horrible in farming today than the standard methods by which we procure milk and eggs.

(And yes, I include organic and free-range stuff in this as well.)

Links from around the web

Wednesday, January 7th, 2009

Here are some links from around the web that you might find interesting.

Audubon magazine has a fantastic article about the environmental impacts of meat-eating.

So why in the world am I a dedicated vegetarian? Why is meat, including sumptuous pork, a complete stranger to my fork at home and away? The answer is simple: I have an 11-year-old son whose future—like yours and mine—is rapidly unraveling due to global warming. And what we put on our plates can directly accelerate or decelerate the heating trend.

No one can call themselves an environmentalist if they’re still tucking into the steak or chicken wings.

Read the whole article here:
http://www.audubonmagazine.org/features0901/viewpoint.html

The latest post on Animal Person has some interesting thoughts on non-human language, and includes the cutest video EVER:
http://www.animalperson.net/animal_person/2009/01/on-the-communication-of-sentient-nonhumans.html

A darkly humorous look at what an animal might think of being slaughtered by a small farmer:
Thank God we were slaughtered by a local farmer instead of one of those big, impersonal corporations!

Ok, I guess I must have been living under a rock for a while, but I never realized Gene Baur had a blog. How crazy is that? Here’s his latest post, as always thoughtful and articulate:
http://www.genebaur.com/blogengine.net/post/2009/01/Big-Problems-e28093-Simple-Solutions.aspx
(If only we could all be as smart and well-spoken as Gene.)

This next article has been popping up on blogs all over the internet. It’s from Newsweek, and it’s about how hunting is altering or reversing evolution, making the weak and sickly MORE likely to survive than the big strong animals. Because we keep killing all the big strong ones and we don’t kill the weak ones. We’re smart that way.
http://www.newsweek.com/id/177709/page/1

Here’s a nice piece on activism. I know a lot of the time when I’m out doing any sort of outreach I get angry a lot. Mostly because people just aren’t changing as soon as I want them to. Changing my perspective could change how I interact with other people and could make me more effective.
http://loveallbeings.org/blog/activism-as-being-not-doing/

Lastly, this isn’t an article or a blog post, but rather a whole website: Altweb: Alternatives to Animal Testing. It’s sponsored by the Johns Hopkins School of Public Health. For those of you who are working on issues of animal testing, this could be a good resource.

That’s it for today. Enjoy!